Contact Us

Static Application Security Testing (White-box)

As software ecosystems become central to enterprise growth, application risk becomes boardlevel risk. Our SAST reviews source code, custom modules, libraries, and development practices to identify vulnerabilities early in the lifecycle. By resolving flaws before deployment, organizations lower remediation costs, improve release confidence, and strengthen secure engineering maturity.

How We Deliver

1. Source Code & Dependency Scan

Automated inspection of proprietary code, open source libraries, and third party components.

2. Taint Flow Analysis

Tracking untrusted data from input to sensitive sinks (SQL queries, OS commands).

3. Manual Expert Validation

Security engineers eliminate false positives and confirm exploitability.

4. Remediation Focused Reporting

Line of code guidance, secure coding examples, and developer friendly output.

5. CI/CD Integration

Seamless plugin into Jenkins, GitLab, Azure DevOps for every commit.

Frequently Asking Questions

SAST should ideally be integrated early in the software development lifecycle and performed continuously during every sprint, build, or major code change. Running security testing before deployment helps identify vulnerabilities before they reach production, significantly reducing remediation costs, release delays, and business risk. It also supports secure development practices within agile and DevSecOps environments.

Yes. SAST can be integrated directly into CI/CD pipelines such as Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps, and GitHub Actions. This allows automated security checks to run during every code commit or build cycle, helping development teams identify and resolve vulnerabilities without slowing delivery timelines.

Yes. Tribastion evaluates proprietary applications, internally developed modules, APIs, and custom business logic alongside open-source dependencies and third-party components. The objective is to identify vulnerabilities that may uniquely impact your organization’s applications and workflows.

Yes. Automated findings are manually reviewed and validated by security experts to eliminate false positives and confirm exploitability. This helps development teams focus only on genuine security risks instead of wasting time on inaccurate alerts.

Yes. Every assessment includes detailed remediation guidance with code-level recommendations, secure coding references, risk prioritization, and practical fixes that developers can implement efficiently. Where required, Tribastion also supports remediation discussions and retesting after fixes are applied.

80+ Partners, One Mission